Joint Landmarks and Parks

WHEREAS, Central Park Conservancy has issued a Project Advisory for Preliminary and Final Review which presents their proposed plans for the Reconstruction of the Cherry Hill Concourse, located on 72^nd Street, between Bethesda Terrace and West Drive, in Central Park; and

WHEREAS, Central Park Conservancy has provided a thoroughly detailed presentation of their proposed project to Community Board Five's Parks and Landmarks Committees; and

WHEREAS, In addition to the need to replace aging pavement, infrastructure and site furnishing, the proposed reconstruction aims to create a more pedestrian-oriented space and inviting destination, while evoking the historic character of the concourse and its connection to the landscape; and

WHEREAS, Cherry Hill Concourse was first constructed in 1859, in accordance with the designs of Olmsted and Vaux, initially serving as a horse-drawn carriage concourse, this was paved in compacted screened gravel on top of a rubble stone foundation; and

WHEREAS, A fountain for watering horses had been installed in 1871 and, shortly thereafter, a narrow landscape margin had been added in a section between the concourse and the pedestrian path, in which trees and shrubs were planted; and

WHEREAS, By 1934 the concourse had been paved with asphalt for usage as an automobile parking lot, and as a means of protection from vehicles, a raised platform was added around the fountain; and

WHEREAS, The current conditions of the Cherry Hill Concourse are resultant of the Parks Department's reconstruction projects dating from 1979 through the early 1980's, which included the restoration of the fountain and the removal of its function as a parking lot; and

WHEREAS, The 1980's reconstruction of the circular platform surrounding the fountain, included paving in brick and bluestone in an interlacing star, reminiscent of the Campidoglio Plaza in Rome, is not based on the designs of Olmsted and Vaux; and

WHEREAS, Also resultant of these earlier reconstruction projects, the area surrounding the fountain was repaved with asphalt and designated as a space for carriages, pedestrians, bicyclists, and special events, and the landscape margin between the asphalt and pedestrian path had been removed and replaced with a paved margin of brick and granite block, all paved areas were separated by curbs, and these decorative pavements and the various curbs that separate them call attention to the concourse itself and tend to frame and emphasize the asphalt roadbed; and

WHEREAS, The scope of work in the current proposed reconstruction project includes:

• Restoration of the historic geometry of the circle and the reduction of the number of curbs by removal of decorative pavement surrounding the fountain and the concourse;
• Re-pavement of the entire concourse with a resin cement aggregate pavement, which in addition to resembling the historic soft surface paving, will permit storm water to drain directly into the subsoil rather than being directed to storm sewers. Aggregate will be locally sourced, 3/8"granite gneiss;
• Retention of the raised area to protect fountain, and re-pavement with aggregate pavement. Definition of the fountain and concourse edge with a sloping bluestone granite curb. Reconstruction of pedestrian paths with asphalt, and access roads with aggregate pavement;
• Reconstruction of the utility infrastructure, including storm drainage, irrigation, and lighting;
• Installation of new site furnishings, including Central Park settee benches, accessible (DPR Type "E") drinking fountain, and new lighting. Creation of access to ledge rock on the hill to the east and recreation of the historic, rustic seating area;
• Restoration of the planting margin between the roadbed and park path around the greater part of the circle and add a new tree and shrub plantings. Enhancement of existing plantings on the hillside to the east of the circle. These horticultural improvements would increase the sense of enclosure by greenery, and will frame views of the Lake from the north end of the circle, where the plantings open up and the lawn slopes down to the shoreline; and

WHEREAS, The proposed project work would make great improvements upon the infrastructure and the aesthetics, as these plans take into account Olmsted &Vaux's original design by minimizing the non-landscape decorative elements; therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That Community Board Five recommends approval of Central Park Conservancy's proposal for the Reconstruction of the Cherry Hill Concourse in Central Park.

The above resolution passed by a vote of 36 in favor; 0 opposed; 1 abstaining.

WHEREAS, The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), operators of the Central Park Zoo, are proposing to construct a new Snow Leopard Facility; and

WHEREAS, Snow Leopards are an endangered species; and

WHEREAS, The facility will be operated cooperatively as part of a national breeding program; and

WHEREAS, The animals are the 3rd and 4th generation of said breeding program and have never lived in the wild; and

WHEREAS, The Wildlife Conservation Society's Director of New York City Zoos is the coordinator of this national breeding program; and 

WHEREAS, This will be a permanent exhibit with a maximum of six animals at any given time; and

WHEREAS, The proposed facility is located within the existing zoo on less than half an acre and will consist of three main elements:

• - a concrete block holding structure, no taller than 9'-10", covered with dark cedar siding
• - two viewing pavilions that mimic the style of other pavilions in the zoo

• - a mesh enclosure supported by poles that is minimally visible; and

WHEREAS, The design will allow maximum viewing by the public while respecting the existing landscape, as well as the social habits and physical requirements of Snow Leopards; and

WHEREAS, The facility will be screened with plantings and has been designed to have minimal visual impact from the adjacent Transverse Drive and East Drive on the Zoo's perimeter; and

WHEREAS, The design was completed with cooperation and input from the NYC Parks Department, and the Central Parks Conservancy; and

WHEREAS, It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed next winter and not during peak visitor season; therefore be it

RESOLVED, That Community Board Five recommends approval of the application by the Wildlife Conservation Society.